So, this week we participated in an ICS training course that
was offered for park staff. ICS stands for Incident Command System. This is a
management/organization system that was developed in the 1970s after several
serious and deadly wildfires in the California and then further developed and
mandated after 9/11 for all ‘incidents.’ (An incident is any natural or human
disaster (flooding, terrorism incident) or significant event that requires
complex structures and handling (presidential visit, memorial event) and may
involve one or more local, state or national agency.)
The training we participated in (ICS 100 and ICS 200) were
basic and intermediate level trainings. There are quite a few additional
trainings - ICS 300 through 800 plus role-specific training for roles within
the ICS system – public information officer, division leader, incident
commander, etc. During ICS 100 and 200 we were introduced into the ICS system,
its organizational structure, roles, responsibilities, operational systems,
etc. This training is designed for
‘single resources’ and how they fit within the ICS system. A single resource
within the ICS system is the individual person with specified skills –
firefighters, police, EMT, finance, logistics, planning, and the like.
Basically how the ICS system operates is that when there is
an incident, everything from a car accident, house fire, hurricane, power plant
accident, or presidential visit, the person or persons in charge initiate the
ICS system and determine the level of incident – Level 1 is the most
significant (major hurricane) to a Level 5 (small house fire). The level of
incident dictates the amount of staff, resources, and roles are required and
dispatched to the incident. Since (hopefully) everyone is trained in ICS, the
organization and management for the incident then precedes along the
established practices of the ICS system. We are told, and as you might imagine,
that how well the system works varies based on the individuals involved, their
level of training, and their adherence to the system. But we are also told that
when implemented the system has saved lives and helped to efficiently handle
many and varied incidents.
How do we fit into this you might ask? We aren’t sure. But,
we are now aware of ICS and trained in it. We will look for additional training
in our future travels (both ICS and beyond). We were given some contact
information by the instructor to inquire about possible trainings and possible
roles. We have already anticipated that we will volunteer for agencies such as
the Red Cross that would appreciate this background (groups like the Red Cross
look for full-time RVers to volunteer at disaster scenes since they are mobile
and do not need housing). And, who knows what else.
On a side note, it was really interesting to be in a
learning/professional role once again. It has been more than 5 months since we
did anything like be in or lead a training, something we did quite often in our
previous lives. This experience certainly sparked many memories and
conversations about where we have been and where we are going and what awaits
us down the road!
No comments:
Post a Comment